Thursday 27 September 2012

Week 7: Visual Narrative and the Media: An image speaks a thousand words – because I made it so.

Question 1: Why is narrative important when shaping a visual image to the audience?


A narrative is...


(from 1:36 - 3:15.)

... story-telling.


For a large portion of our elementary and secondary English classes, we were occasionally asked to write a narrative. The term"narrator" derives from this. A narrator is the person telling the story, like the one in the video above.

A narrative is made up of a story and discourse (Louis, 2005). According to Chatman (as cited in Louis, 2005), a story is the content of the story – what happens in the story – whereas discourse refers to the intended meaning and is concerned with how the message is conveyed. To simplify matters, the semiotic equivalents are in a way like:-


story = denotation; deals with superficial things like what is seen
discourse = connotation; goes under the surface level, relates to intended meaning

Lamarque (1994) identifies “four basic dimensions of all narrative: time, structure, voice and point of view”. This is equivalent to temporality and duration, genre, subject and focalisation, respectively from our lecture slides. “Structure” refers to the framework in which the narrative is fit into, “voice” is the narrator of the story whilst “point of view” literally means that – the perspective in which the story is told from.

The purpose of a visual narrative, according to Ware (2008) “is to capture the cognitive thread of the audience”. “Cognitive thread” here refers to an individual’s ability to draw on their existing schema to follow what is being told to them, either in a verbal or visual manner. In short, the statement made by Ware (2008) basically means that the aims of a visual narrative is to capture the audiences' attention by telling a story they are familiar with. In an advertiser's point of view, narrative is important because in order to successfully promote the product they are selling, they would need the advert to have a narrative the audience can identify.

To answer the question, a narrative is important when constructing a visual image to the audience because without all the components of a narrative, the audience may have difficulties in associating with the image displayed to them. A story without meaning and vice versa is something not everyone can associate with, thus narrative is important when constructing a visual image for an audience.




This video is a video without a narrative. The video does not have a message nor does it have a story. Personally, I zoned out after a while. The only thing keeping me alive (at least) was the jolly music and very adorable cat.

References:

Barbatsis, G. (2005). Narrative Theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods and media (pp. 329-350). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Lamarque, P. (1994). Narrative and invention: The limits of fictionality. In C. Nash (Ed.), Narrative in culture: The uses of storytelling in the sciences, philosophy, and literature (pp. 133-156). London: Routledge.

Ware, C. (2008). Visual thinking for design. Morgan Kauffman. Burlington, MA: Marta Kauffman Publishers.


Thursday 20 September 2012

Week 6: The Ancient Art of Rhetoric and Persuasion


Question 1: Before coming to class, bring a print advertisement that you believe persuades the reader rhetorically. Explain your case using the concepts learnt this week.

Ever heard "rhetorical question" being dropped in casual conversation? Honestly, if you've realised it yet, its just a way of pointing out the obvious, but in question form. It's the speakers way of saying – “I know what I'm saying is right, so don't question me!” By now, you might be wondering, “where's she trying to go with this?” or “and your point is..?”. The answer, this entry will deal with Rhetoric. Don't think that rhetorical questions or statements only exist in verbal communication. It extends to visual communication. How do you think advertisements become successful?

Rhetoric, according to Blair (2004, p. 41), “is the study and use of instruments of persuasion”. Dr. Chris Woo has also done us the courtesy of bolding the definition of rhetoric in bright red in our lecture slides.


print screen from lecture slide

For the purpose of this week journal entry, I will be using a print advertisement which I've selected from google images, and will use the components of visual rhetoric learned in class to explain why the advertisement sells (at least to me). The advertisement I selected is a McDonald's ad:



From the advertisement, you can assume that it is trying to say that McDonald's serves fresh fries which is just that good. How can you reach this assumption? The advertisement does not lay it out on a silver platter to you. Instead, it makes you connect the dots. In relation to the previous entry, this would not succeed if you do not have the schema for french fries.

So, how exactly does the advertisement do this? The advertisement is enthymemic in nature. 'Enthymeme' means incomplete truth – the arguments served to audience is only partial and that rest is to be assumed by the audience (byu.edu, n.d.). The McDonald's advertisement makes you assume the intended message by only supplying you with a series of transformations of a potato. The advertisement provides you with the argument:
 

  • French fries that are freshly made are from potatoes which are good.
  • McDonald's french fries are made from potatoes.
  • Therefore, McDonald's french fries are delicious because they are made fresh from potatoes.

Another reason which can explain why the advertisement is persuasive is because of the medium it uses. This falls under the claim that rhetoric in advertising prioritizes the style over the content (McQuarrie & Philipps, 2007, p. 4). The advertisement would not be as convincing if it were disseminated via other mediums. For instance, if this were on television, it would not be as well received because the 'language' of television is different from that of print advertisements.

Last but not at least, linking back from Week 3 topic which is Semiotics. This advertisement would not have been persuasive if the captions did not exist. This is called 'anchoring'. 'Anchoring' is when a texts link the picture to the intended message (Sells & Gonzales, 2002). Without the captions, the picture would not make sense because it would just be a picture of a potato, french fries and an almost finished package of french fries. If the pictures didn't make sense, then the ad would fail in trying to capture people's attention and persuade their audiences.

In conclusion, the advertisement is persuasive because it captures people’s attention by making them make cognitive links by being enthymemic in nature, prioritizes the style over the content and by using the semiotic tool, anchoring.

Though I think part of the reason why this print advertisement sells to me is because 1) I'm hungry and 2) I crave McDonald's!

References:

Blair, J. A. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41-61). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

byu.edu. (n.d.). Enthymeme. Retrieved from http://rhetoric.byu.edu/figures/e/enthymeme.htm on 20th September, 2012

McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2007). Advertising rhetoric. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Sellers, P., & Gonzales, S. (2002). The language of advertising. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/class/linguist34/Unit_03/anchor-relay.htm on 20th September, 2012